Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is put in its place.
Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a go to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, to the other hand, offers financial relief by inserting an employee in a higher fork out scale, without changing their work duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same pay out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they absence prospects for promotion. Upgradation is a policy Instrument used to reduce the hardship of extensive-term stagnation. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Woman will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province check here of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should evaluate the merit of many of the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of eligible candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded from the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part from the respondent department.
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the law. This example of case regulation refers to two cases read in the state court, for the same level.
Generally, only an appeal accepted by the court of past vacation resort will resolve such differences and, For lots of reasons, these appeals in many cases are not granted.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.